{"id":9259,"date":"2025-08-12T09:48:26","date_gmt":"2025-08-12T07:48:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/observatory\/sentenza-n-115-2025-la-corte-costituzionale-riconosce-il-congedo-obbligatorio-alla-madre-intenzionale\/"},"modified":"2025-08-12T10:57:41","modified_gmt":"2025-08-12T08:57:41","slug":"sentenza-n-115-2025-la-corte-costituzionale-riconosce-il-congedo-obbligatorio-alla-madre-intenzionale","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/en\/observatory\/mandatory-leave-for-the-intended-mother\/","title":{"rendered":"Judgment No. 115\/2025: The Constitutional Court recognises mandatory leave for the intended mother"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

With Judgment No. 115 of 2025, the Constitutional Court declared the unconstitutionality of Article 27-bis of Legislative Decree No. 151\/2001, insofar as it fails to grant mandatory paternity leave to an employed intended mother in a female same-sex couple who is registered as a parent in the civil status records<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The case was referred by the Labour Section of the Brescia Court of Appeal in proceedings initiated by Rete Lenford under Articles 2 and 3 of Legislative Decree No. 215\/2003 and Article 28 of Legislative Decree No. 150\/2011, seeking to establish discrimination against same-sex couples.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The worker, an intended mother, had been denied by the National Social Security Institute (INPS) the mandatory leave granted to employed fathers, on the grounds that she was \u201cnot a father,\u201d <\/strong>despite being listed as the second parent on the child\u2019s birth certificate. The court of first instance upheld her claim, ordering INPS to amend its IT system to allow the entry of parents\u2019 tax codes irrespective of gender, with a penalty for each day\u2019s delay in compliance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, the worker argued that the ruling did not clearly establish the right of same-sex couples to access parental leave on the same basis as heterosexual couples<\/strong>. This led to the referral to the Constitutional Court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The contested legal framework<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Article 27-bis of Legislative Decree No. 151\/2001, introduced by Legislative Decree No. 105\/2022, grants employed fathers the right to 10 days of mandatory, fully paid leave to be taken within five months of the child\u2019s birth. It implicitly excludes the intended mother, even when officially recognised as a parent in the civil status records.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The issues raised<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Court of Appeal alleged violations of Article 3 of the Constitution (principle of equality) and Article 117, paragraph 1, in relation to:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2022 Articles 2 and 3 of Directive 2000\/78\/EC<\/strong> (equal treatment in employment and occupation),
\u2022 Article 4 of Directive (EU) 2019\/1158<\/strong>, which extends the right to mandatory leave to the \u201csecond equivalent parent.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Constitutional Court\u2019s ruling<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Court referred to extensive constitutional case law that values the parental role as a shared responsibility, independent of gender or biological ties (including Judgments No. 285\/2010, 105\/2018, and 68\/2025).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It further noted that a child\u2019s right to maintain a relationship with both parents is safeguarded:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2022 by the Constitution (Articles 30 and 31),<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2022 by the Civil Code (Articles 315-bis and 337-ter),<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2022 by international and EU instruments (UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Court affirmed that intentional parenthood<\/strong> has full legal relevance and that sexual orientation has no bearing on the capacity to assume parental responsibilities<\/strong>. The parental bond is not solely based on biological factors but arises from the conscious assumption of responsibility and the joint commitment to care for the child. In this context, excluding the intended mother from mandatory leave, despite her role being equivalent to that of a father in a heterosexual couple, is manifestly unreasonable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Accordingly, the Court declared Article 27-bis of Legislative Decree No. 151\/2001 unconstitutional insofar as it does not grant mandatory paternity leave to an employed intended mother in a female same-sex couple, both members of which are registered as parents in the civil status records.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Practical implications following the ruling<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The decision obliges INPS and employers to recognise and process leave requests submitted by the second mother in female same-sex couples. This may be done via self-certification, provided the parental bond is evidenced in the civil status records.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Beyond its immediate administrative impact, the ruling marks a significant step towards a more inclusive system of protections, in line with developments in European law on work\u2013life balance.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

With Judgment No. 115 of 2025, the Constitutional Court declared the unconstitutionality of Article 27-bis of Legislative Decree No. 151\/2001, insofar as it fails to grant mandatory paternity leave to an employed intended mother in a female same-sex couple who is registered as a parent in the civil status records. The case was referred by […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[285,515],"class_list":["post-9259","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-observatory","tag-inps-en","tag-paternity-leave"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nmandatory leave for the intended mother - HR Capital<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"With Judgment No. 115 of 2025, the Constitutional Court declared the unconstitutionality of Article 27-bis of Legislative Decree No. 151\/2001, insofar as it fails to grant mandatory paternity leave to an employed intended mother in a female same-sex couple who is registered as a parent in the civil status records.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/en\/observatory\/mandatory-leave-for-the-intended-mother\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"mandatory leave for the intended mother - HR Capital\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"With Judgment No. 115 of 2025, the Constitutional Court declared the unconstitutionality of Article 27-bis of Legislative Decree No. 151\/2001, insofar as it fails to grant mandatory paternity leave to an employed intended mother in a female same-sex couple who is registered as a parent in the civil status records.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/en\/observatory\/mandatory-leave-for-the-intended-mother\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"HR Capital\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-08-12T07:48:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-08-12T08:57:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/shutterstock_1487940578.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"800\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Roberta Ranghetti\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Roberta Ranghetti\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hrcapital.it\\\/en\\\/observatory\\\/mandatory-leave-for-the-intended-mother\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hrcapital.it\\\/en\\\/observatory\\\/mandatory-leave-for-the-intended-mother\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Roberta Ranghetti\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hrcapital.it\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e4f3035e8b05bba108f05bc0adb960b7\"},\"headline\":\"Judgment No. 115\\\/2025: The Constitutional Court recognises mandatory leave for the intended mother\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-08-12T07:48:26+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-08-12T08:57:41+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hrcapital.it\\\/en\\\/observatory\\\/mandatory-leave-for-the-intended-mother\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":596,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hrcapital.it\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hrcapital.it\\\/en\\\/observatory\\\/mandatory-leave-for-the-intended-mother\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hrcapital.it\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/08\\\/shutterstock_1487940578-1024x683.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"INPS\",\"Paternity Leave\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Observatory\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hrcapital.it\\\/en\\\/observatory\\\/mandatory-leave-for-the-intended-mother\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hrcapital.it\\\/en\\\/observatory\\\/mandatory-leave-for-the-intended-mother\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hrcapital.it\\\/en\\\/observatory\\\/mandatory-leave-for-the-intended-mother\\\/\",\"name\":\"mandatory leave for the intended mother - HR Capital\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hrcapital.it\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hrcapital.it\\\/en\\\/observatory\\\/mandatory-leave-for-the-intended-mother\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hrcapital.it\\\/en\\\/observatory\\\/mandatory-leave-for-the-intended-mother\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hrcapital.it\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/08\\\/shutterstock_1487940578-1024x683.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-08-12T07:48:26+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-08-12T08:57:41+00:00\",\"description\":\"With Judgment No. 115 of 2025, the Constitutional Court declared the unconstitutionality of Article 27-bis of Legislative Decree No. 151\\\/2001, insofar as it fails to grant mandatory paternity leave to an employed intended mother in a female same-sex couple who is registered as a parent in the civil status records.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hrcapital.it\\\/en\\\/observatory\\\/mandatory-leave-for-the-intended-mother\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hrcapital.it\\\/en\\\/observatory\\\/mandatory-leave-for-the-intended-mother\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hrcapital.it\\\/en\\\/observatory\\\/mandatory-leave-for-the-intended-mother\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hrcapital.it\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/08\\\/shutterstock_1487940578-1024x683.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hrcapital.it\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/08\\\/shutterstock_1487940578-1024x683.jpg\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hrcapital.it\\\/en\\\/observatory\\\/mandatory-leave-for-the-intended-mother\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hrcapital.it\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Judgment No. 115\\\/2025: The Constitutional Court recognises mandatory leave for the intended mother\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hrcapital.it\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hrcapital.it\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"HR Capital\",\"description\":\"HR Advisor & Payroll\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hrcapital.it\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hrcapital.it\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hrcapital.it\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"HR Capital\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hrcapital.it\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hrcapital.it\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hrcapital.it\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/03\\\/nuovologohr.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hrcapital.it\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/03\\\/nuovologohr.png\",\"width\":270,\"height\":65,\"caption\":\"HR Capital\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hrcapital.it\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/hr-capital-s-r-l-\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.hrcapital.it\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/e4f3035e8b05bba108f05bc0adb960b7\",\"name\":\"Roberta Ranghetti\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/5aaa62720b284e5be336f429e5bcfdd8c5dc24558ca6f56fcec4e8a1b091e3e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/5aaa62720b284e5be336f429e5bcfdd8c5dc24558ca6f56fcec4e8a1b091e3e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/5aaa62720b284e5be336f429e5bcfdd8c5dc24558ca6f56fcec4e8a1b091e3e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Roberta Ranghetti\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"mandatory leave for the intended mother - HR Capital","description":"With Judgment No. 115 of 2025, the Constitutional Court declared the unconstitutionality of Article 27-bis of Legislative Decree No. 151\/2001, insofar as it fails to grant mandatory paternity leave to an employed intended mother in a female same-sex couple who is registered as a parent in the civil status records.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/en\/observatory\/mandatory-leave-for-the-intended-mother\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"mandatory leave for the intended mother - HR Capital","og_description":"With Judgment No. 115 of 2025, the Constitutional Court declared the unconstitutionality of Article 27-bis of Legislative Decree No. 151\/2001, insofar as it fails to grant mandatory paternity leave to an employed intended mother in a female same-sex couple who is registered as a parent in the civil status records.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/en\/observatory\/mandatory-leave-for-the-intended-mother\/","og_site_name":"HR Capital","article_published_time":"2025-08-12T07:48:26+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-08-12T08:57:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":800,"url":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/shutterstock_1487940578.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Roberta Ranghetti","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Roberta Ranghetti","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/en\/observatory\/mandatory-leave-for-the-intended-mother\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/en\/observatory\/mandatory-leave-for-the-intended-mother\/"},"author":{"name":"Roberta Ranghetti","@id":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/e4f3035e8b05bba108f05bc0adb960b7"},"headline":"Judgment No. 115\/2025: The Constitutional Court recognises mandatory leave for the intended mother","datePublished":"2025-08-12T07:48:26+00:00","dateModified":"2025-08-12T08:57:41+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/en\/observatory\/mandatory-leave-for-the-intended-mother\/"},"wordCount":596,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/en\/observatory\/mandatory-leave-for-the-intended-mother\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/shutterstock_1487940578-1024x683.jpg","keywords":["INPS","Paternity Leave"],"articleSection":["Observatory"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/en\/observatory\/mandatory-leave-for-the-intended-mother\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/en\/observatory\/mandatory-leave-for-the-intended-mother\/","url":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/en\/observatory\/mandatory-leave-for-the-intended-mother\/","name":"mandatory leave for the intended mother - HR Capital","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/en\/observatory\/mandatory-leave-for-the-intended-mother\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/en\/observatory\/mandatory-leave-for-the-intended-mother\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/shutterstock_1487940578-1024x683.jpg","datePublished":"2025-08-12T07:48:26+00:00","dateModified":"2025-08-12T08:57:41+00:00","description":"With Judgment No. 115 of 2025, the Constitutional Court declared the unconstitutionality of Article 27-bis of Legislative Decree No. 151\/2001, insofar as it fails to grant mandatory paternity leave to an employed intended mother in a female same-sex couple who is registered as a parent in the civil status records.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/en\/observatory\/mandatory-leave-for-the-intended-mother\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/en\/observatory\/mandatory-leave-for-the-intended-mother\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/en\/observatory\/mandatory-leave-for-the-intended-mother\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/shutterstock_1487940578-1024x683.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/shutterstock_1487940578-1024x683.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/en\/observatory\/mandatory-leave-for-the-intended-mother\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Judgment No. 115\/2025: The Constitutional Court recognises mandatory leave for the intended mother"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/en\/","name":"HR Capital","description":"HR Advisor & Payroll","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/en\/#organization","name":"HR Capital","url":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/nuovologohr.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/nuovologohr.png","width":270,"height":65,"caption":"HR Capital"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/hr-capital-s-r-l-"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/e4f3035e8b05bba108f05bc0adb960b7","name":"Roberta Ranghetti","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5aaa62720b284e5be336f429e5bcfdd8c5dc24558ca6f56fcec4e8a1b091e3e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5aaa62720b284e5be336f429e5bcfdd8c5dc24558ca6f56fcec4e8a1b091e3e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5aaa62720b284e5be336f429e5bcfdd8c5dc24558ca6f56fcec4e8a1b091e3e8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Roberta Ranghetti"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9259","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9259"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9259\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9265,"href":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9259\/revisions\/9265"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9259"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9259"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hrcapital.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9259"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}